Impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the management of patients with plasma cell disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT examinations on the management of patients with plasma cell disorders. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients in a provincial database with PET/CT performed for plasma cell disorders between 2011 and 2018. The impact of PET/CT on actual patient management and outcome was assessed by two independent readers who compared planned pre-PET/CT management, documented at time of PET/CT requisition, to actual management received through linkages to administrative databases. PET/CT was considered of high impact if it altered the provision of active treatment, changed the modality of treatment or chemotherapy regimen. Change in management and the proportion of patients with high impact PET/CT were assessed. RESULTS: There were 44 patients with plasma cell disorders, including multiple myeloma, solitary plasmacytoma, Polyneuropathy, Organomegaly, Endocrinopathy, Monoclonal protein, Skin changes syndrome, or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or biclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Management was altered after 38/56 (67.9%) PET/CT scans. Considering just the initial PET/CT scan in patients who underwent multiple scans, 31/44 (70.5%) patients had their management altered subsequent to PET/CT. CONCLUSION: PET/CT resulted in a change in planned management in more than two-thirds of patients with plasma cell disorders in the current selected patient cohort. These results should be validated in a larger prospective trial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".