Evolutionary Outcomes of Diversely Functionalized Aptamers Isolated from <i>in Vitro</i> Evolution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expanding the chemical diversity of aptamers remains an important thrust in the field in order to increase their functional potential. Previously, our group developed LOOPER, which enables the incorporation of up to 16 unique modifications throughout a ssDNA sequence, and applied it to the in vitro evolution of thrombin binders. As LOOPER-derived highly modified nucleic acids polymers are governed by two interrelated evolutionary variables, namely, functional modifications and sequence, the evolution of this polymer contrasts with that of canonical DNA. Herein we provide in-depth analysis of the evolution, including structure–activity relationships, mapping of evolutionary pressures on the library, and analysis of plausible evolutionary pathways that resulted in the first LOOPER-derived aptamer, TBL1. A detailed picture of how TBL1 interacts with thrombin and how it may mimic known peptide binders of thrombin is also proposed. Structural modeling and folding studies afford insights into how the aptamer displays critical modifications and also how modifications enhance the structural stability of the aptamer. A discussion of benefits and potential limitations of LOOPER during in vitro evolution is provided, which will serve to guide future evolutions of this highly modified class of aptamers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it