MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991530749 · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvz267

The contribution of sleep to social inequalities in cardiovascular disorders: a multi-cohort study

2019· article· en· W2991530749 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dušan Petrović, José Haba‐Rubio, Carlos de Mestral, Michelle Kelly‐Irving, Paolo Vineis, Mika Kivimäki, Solja T. Nyberg, Martina Gandini, Murielle Bochud, Péter Vollenweider, Angelo d’Errico, Henrique Barros, Sílvia Fraga, Marcel Goldberg, Marie Zins, Andrew Steptoe, Cyrille Delpierre, Raphaël Heinzer, Cristian Carmeli, Marc Chadeau‐Hyam, Silvia Stringhini

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiovascular Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthInstitut pour la Recherche en Santé PubliqueInstitute for Work and HealthChinese Society of Clinical OncologyHealth and Safety ExecutiveInstitut Gustave-RoussyAgence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Environnement et du TravailNordForskSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungInstitut National Du CancerInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleEconomic and Social Research CouncilFondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le CancerAgence Nationale de la RechercheCancer Research UKNational Institute on AgingNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchDepartment of Health and Aged Care, Australian GovernmentEuropean CommissionFondation de FranceLigue Contre le CancerBritish Heart FoundationGlaxoSmithKlineAgency for Health Care Policy and ResearchJohn D. and Catherine T. MacArthur FoundationMutuelle Générale de l'Education NationaleNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMedicineLife course approachSocioeconomic statusCohort studyCohortDemographyGerontologySleep (system call)MediationCross-sectional studyInternal medicinePsychologyPopulationEnvironmental healthDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Sleep disturbances exhibit a strong social patterning, and inadequate sleep has been associated with adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disorders (CVD). However, the contribution of sleep to socioeconomic inequalities in CVD is unclear. This study pools data from eight European cohorts to investigate the role of sleep duration in the association between life-course socioeconomic status (SES) and CVD. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used cross-sectional data from eight European cohorts, totalling 111 205 participants. Life-course SES was assessed using father's and adult occupational position. Self-reported sleep duration was categorized into recommended (6-8.5 h/night), long (>8.5 h/night), and short (<6 h/night). We examined two cardiovascular outcomes: coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. Main analyses were conducted using pooled data and examined the association between life-course SES and CVD, and the contribution of sleep duration to this gradient using counterfactual mediation. Low father's occupational position was associated with an increased risk of CHD (men: OR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.04; 1.37]; women: OR = 1.25, 95% CI [1.02; 1.54]), with marginal decrease of the gradient after accounting for adult occupational position (men: OR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.02; 1.35]; women: OR = 1.22, 95% CI [0.99; 1.52]), and no mediating effect by short sleep duration. Low adult occupational position was associated with an increased risk of CHD in both men and women (men: OR = 1.48, 95% CI [1.14; 1.92]; women: OR = 1.53, 95% CI [1.04; 2.21]). Short sleep duration meaningfully contributed to the association between adult occupational position and CHD in men, with 13.4% mediation. Stroke did not exhibit a social patterning with any of the variables examined. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that inadequate sleep accounts to a meaningful proportion of the association between adult occupational position and CHD, at least in men. With sleep increasingly being considered an important cardiovascular risk factor in its own terms, our study additionally points to its potential role in social inequalities in cardiovascular disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiovascular ResearchSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207