MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991572706

Isocentric Navigation of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy at the L5/S1 Level in Difficult Puncture Cases: A Technical Note.

2017· article· en· W2991572706 on OpenAlexaff
Guoxin Fan, Teng Wang, Shuo Hu, Xiaofei Guan, Xin Gu, Shisheng He

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFluoroscopyPercutaneousForamenSurgeryDiskectomyVisual analogue scaleDiscectomyRadiologyLumbar vertebraeLumbar
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Accurate puncture during percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy at the L5/S1 level in cases with high iliac crest and narrow foramen were difficult, even though the difficulties of foraminoplasty could be overcome by advanced instruments like reamers. OBJECTIVES: The report aimed to describe an isocentric navigation technique with a definite pathway in difficult puncture cases at the L5/S1 level. STUDY DESIGN: Technical note. SETTING: Difficult punctures were defined as over 10 punctures of the needle before obtaining an ideal puncture location by senior surgeons with experience of over 500 percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) cases. METHODS: A total of 124 punctures were recorded in 11 difficult puncture cases at the L5/S1 level. A definite pathway was created by an isocentric navigation theory, which was based on a surface locator and an arch-guided device. The surface locator was used to rapidly and accurately identify the puncture target with the recognition of the surrounding rods under fluoroscopy. The arch-guided device can ensure that the puncture target always remains at the center of a virtual sphere. We recorded the puncture times, fluoroscopy exposure times, radiation exposure time, operative time, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopeadic Association (JOA) score, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The average puncture times were significantly reduced to 1.27 with the arch-guided device compared with conventional puncture methods (P < 0.05). The average operative time was 90.09 ± 11.00 minutes and the fluoroscopy times were 53.36 ± 5.85. The radiation exposure time was 50.91 ± 5.20 seconds. VAS score of leg and back pain, as well as JOA score, were all significantly improved after surgery (P < 0.05). The excellent and good rate of satisfaction was 90.91%. No major complications, including cerebral fluid leakage, surgical infection, and postoperative nerve root injury, were recorded in this small sample. LIMITATIONS: This was a small-sample study with a short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The novel isocentric navigation technique with a definite pathway is practical and effective in reducing puncture times among difficult puncture cases at the L5/S1 level, which may contribute to the capacity of PETD at the L5/S1 level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207