MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991741060 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.02680

Local Turbulence: Effects and causes

2019· preprint· W2991741060 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olivier Lai, Kanoa Withington, Romain Laugier, Mark Chun

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulenceComputer sciencePhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dome seeing is a known source of image quality degradation, but despite tremendous progress in wavefront control with the development of adaptive optics and environmental control through implementation of dome venting, surprisingly little is known about it quantitatively. We have found evidence of non-Kolmogorov dome turbulence from our observations with the imaka wide field adaptive optics system; PSFs seem to indicate an excess of high spatial frequencies and turbulence profiles reveal turbulence at negative conjugations. This has motivated the development of a new type of optical turbulence sensor called AIR-FLOW, Airborne Interferometric Recombiner: Fluctuations of Light at Optical Wavelengths. It is a non-redundant mask imaging interferometer that samples the optical turbulence passing through a measurement cell and it measures the two-dimensional optical Phase Structure Function. This is a useful tool to characterise different types of turbulence (e.g. Kolmogorov, diffusive turbulence, etc.). By fitting different models, we can determine parameters such as Cn 2 , r0, L0 or deviation from fully developed turbulence. The instrument was tested at the Canada France Hawaii Telescope, at the University of Hawaii 2.2-meter telescope (UH88'') and at the Observatoire de la C{\^o}te d'Azur. It is ruggedised and sensitive enough to detect changes with different dome vent configurations, as well as slow local variations of the index of refraction in the UH88'' telescope tube. The instrument is portable enough that it can be used to locate sources of turbulence inside and around domes, but it can also be used in an operational setting without affecting observations to characterise the local optical turbulence responsible for dome seeing. Thus, it could be used in real-time observatory control systems to configure vents and air handlers to effectively reduce dome seeing. We believe it could also be a tool for site surveys to evaluate dome seeing mitigation strategies in situ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207