Characterization of relapse in patients with clinical stage I (CSI) nonseminoma (NS-TC) managed with active surveillance (AS): A large multicenter study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4503 Background: Large single institution trials have demonstrated that AS for patients with CSI NS-TC is safe and effective. Information on timing and extent of relapse following AS has the potential to guide intensity and duration of imaging on AS. Methods: Retrospective clinical data on CSI patients were obtained from existing large databases, including institutions/regions which have a standardized policy of centralized management of testicular cancer including AS for patients with CSI NS-TC. In all, 1,034 patients with CSI NS-TC managed with AS were reviewed of whom 886 had no lymphovascular invasion (LVI-), 220 had lymphovascular invasion (LVI+) and 28 had unknown lymphovascular status (LVI unknown). Results: A total of 221 relapses occurred with 150/886 (17%) of LVI– pts , 60/120 (50%) LVI+ pts and 11/28 (39%) of LVI unknown pts (Table). Median follow-up was 63 months (1-163 months). At last follow up 1,013/1,034 (98%) were alive without disease, 16/1,034 (1.5%) were dead of other causes and 7/1,035 (0.05%) were alive with disease or dead of disease. Relapse was identified by marker elevation and/or abdominal imaging in almost all patients. Few patients relapsed with IGCCCC intermediate (18/221, 8%) or poor risk disease (3/221, 1.4%). Conclusions: AS for CSI NS-TC is safe and effective, using a policy of centralized management with loco-regional delivery of care. Our multinational outcomes compare well to single institutional reports. Relapse other than with IGCCC good risk disease was uncommon and death from disease was rare. Compared to patients with LVI-, relapses in LVI + CSI patients occur earlier and few relapses are detected past the first year of follow-up. This data may help in the design of follow up schedules tailored towards the relapse risk in CSI NS-TC AS. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".