MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2991852042 · doi:10.1093/jas/skz258.645

PSIV-B-29 Late-Breaking: Evaluation of arginine requirements of growing > 14 week to 9 month old Labrador retrievers using differing diet formulations and the indicator amino acid oxidation technique

2019· article· en· W2991852042 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C.N. Coon, Jessica L Varney, Jordan Weil, Jason W Fowler, Mary Ann Boggess

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmino acidPhenylalanineIsotope-ratio mass spectrometryArginineAnimal scienceChemistryLysineBreath testBiochemistryBiologyChromatographyMass spectrometryInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Over time, the need to update amino acid requirements for canines is increasingly important due to genetic selection and the demand for more advanced diets. Amino acid requirements can be determined through differing methods including, but not limited to, nitrogen balance studies and the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) technique. In this study, the IAAO method was studied on a total of six growing Labrador Retrievers to determine their individual amino acid requirements. Twelve test diets with varying levels of Arg were utilized to conduct this experiment. Six diets contained excess Lys with respect to Arg (Group 1), while the remaining diets contained lower Lys inclusions (Group 2). Diets were formulated to 1.6x NRC values for all indispensable amino acids, including Lys. Group 2 diet formulations were formulated the same as Group I, except the test Lys was set at 0.1% above test Arg levels. The control diet was fed for two days, followed by a day in which the test diet was fed, a tracer amino acid was supplied, and breath samples were collected. On test day, a priming dose of L-[1-13C]phenylalanine (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc.) based on the subject’s body weight was first supplied, followed by [1-13C]Phe doses every thirty minutes, spanning a four hour period. A respiration mask was placed on each subject every thirty minutes (Oxymax, Columbus Instruments), 13CO2 was collected, and enrichment was determined by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). Results for IRMS were converted to atom percent excess (APE) and analyzed using a piecewise model of best fit (JMP Pro 14.1). Through the segmented line regression, the arginine mean requirement and population safe requirements of growing dogs in Groups 1 and 2 was found to be 1.49 ± 0.30 and 1.38 ± 0.21 g/1000 kcal ME (mean ± 2SD), respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders→French-language works237,207→