Écrire et transmettre l’expérience de l’arrivée dans une nouvelle culture. Caractéristiques esthétiques et narratives dans Les maisons de cristal (1990) d’Annick Perrot-Bishop et Ru (2009) de Kim Thúy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article analyse deux textes écrits par deux écrivaines canadiennes d’origine vietnamienne : Les maisons de cristal (1990) d’Annick Perrot-Bishop et Ru (2009) de Kim Thúy. À travers une analyse narratologique qui tient compte des caractéristiques génériques de genre et de mémoire lors du processus de migration, nous examinerons leurs similitudes par rapport à en ce qui concerne la transcription de l’expérience de l’arrivée dans une nouvelle culture. Nous mettrons en évidence comment la voix autodiégétique donne la possibilité d’entendre des voix migrantes rarement entendues : à la fois féminines et enfantines. La focalisation interne reflète une approche multiperspectiviste qui relativise les positions individuelles et rend compte de la complexité de la migration. Enfin, l’hybridité du genre et la structure fragmentaire reproduisent l’expérience migratoire non seulement de manière esthétique, mais aussi émotive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".