MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991995803 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1900049

Cathodoluminescence and trace-element chemistry of quartz from Sudbury offset dikes: Observations, interpretations, and genetic implications

2019· article· en· W2991995803 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Elliot A. Wehrle, Andrew M. McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuartzCathodoluminescenceGeologyTrace elementMineralogyDikeDioriteElectron microprobeCopperRutileGeochemistryChalcopyriteAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryLuminescenceMaterials scienceMetallurgyEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Offset dikes, radial and concentric fractures infilled with quartz diorite, are important hosts of Ni-Cu-PGE mineralization in the Sudbury area. To better understand their emplacement and evolution, the cathodoluminescence (CL) and trace-element chemistry of quartz were examined in quartz diorite from the Foy, Trill, Whistle, Hess, Parkin (North Range), and Copper Cliff (South Range) offsets. Although the potential causes of the CL response in quartz are considered, the primary focus was the qualitative textures and patterns, as these can provide valuable paragenetic information. Quartz from the North Range displays a strong blue luminescence dominated by homogenous and sharply zoned CL patterns, while that from the Copper Cliff offset displays a weak CL response. Locally recrystallized granoblastic quartz shows diffuse concentric zoning and other heterogeneous CL patterns. Trace-element EPMA-WDS analyses indicate that quartz from the Foy, Trill, and Whistle offsets is enriched in Al (30–600 ppm) and Ti (50–520 ppm) as compared to Fe (<25–490 ppm), while quartz from the Parkin and Hess offsets is enriched in Fe (270–700 ppm) as compared to Ti (44–211 ppm) and Al (95–250 ppm). In contrast to the North Range offsets, quartz from Copper Cliff has low Al concentrations (30–85 ppm) and very low Ti concentrations (<25 ppm). Application of the Ti-in-quartz geothermometer indicates that quartz from the North Range offsets crystallized above 600 °C, while that from the Copper Cliff offset crystallized below 600 °C. The CL responses and trace-element compositions of anhedral quartz from the North Range offsets are consistent with primary crystallization of quartz from magmatic quartz diorite, while those of the granoblastic quartz record dynamic recrystallization and Ostwald ripening. Copper Cliff quartz is anomalous in its CL response, trace-element content, and crystallization temperature, which may reflect overprinting during regional metamorphism of the South Range of the Sudbury Igneous Complex. Quartz CL is demonstrated to be an important tool for discerning and discriminating between paragenetic processes related to the formation of the offset dikes and has clear applications to the study of other quartz-bearing igneous rocks in the Sudbury area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207