MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992020759 · doi:10.1159/000504653

Mixing Apples and Oranges in Assessing Outcomes of Repetitive Transcranial Stimulation Meta-Analyses

2019· letter· en· W2992020759 on OpenAlexafffund
André R. Brunoni, Martijn Arns, Chris Baeken, Daniel M. Blumberger, Jérôme Brunelin, Linda L. Carpenter, Jonathan Downar, Daniel Keeser, Berthold Langguth, Fady Rachid, Alexander T. Sack, Fidel Vila‐Rodriguez, Frank Padberg

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychotherapy and Psychosomatics · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversité de LyonLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenUniversität RegensburgCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversiteit GentUniversiteit MaastrichtUniversity of TorontoUniversidade de São PauloUniversity of British ColumbiaBrown UniversityTechnische Universiteit EindhovenInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleMaastricht Universitair Medisch CentrumFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São PauloVrije Universiteit Brussel
KeywordsPsychologyTranscranial magnetic stimulationMeta-analysisStimulationPsychotherapistMedicineClinical psychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationNeuroscienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International audience

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.110
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.364
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1100.364
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0130.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.214
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychotherapy and PsychosomaticsSame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207