Dense fibroadhesive scarring and poor blood vessel-maturation hamper the integration of implanted collagen scaffolds in an experimental model of spinal cord injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Severe spinal cord injury (SCI) results in permanent functional deficits, which despite pre-clinical advances, remain untreatable. Combinational approaches, including the implantation of bioengineered scaffolds are likely to promote significant tissue repair. However, this critically depends on the extent to which host tissue can integrate with the implant. In the present paper, blood vessel formation and maturation were studied within and around implanted micro-structured type-I collagen scaffolds at 10 weeks post implantation in adult rat mid-cervical spinal cord lateral funiculotomy injuries. Morphometric analysis revealed that blood vessel density within the scaffold was similar to that of the lateral white matter tracts that the implant replaced. However, immunohistochemistry for zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and endothelial barrier antigen revealed that scaffold microvessels remained largely immature, suggesting poor blood-spinal cord barrier (BSB) reformation. Furthermore, a band of intense ZO-1-immunoreactive fibroblast-like cells isolated the implant. Spinal cord vessels outside the ZO-1-band demonstrated BSB-formation, while vessels within the scaffold generally did not. The formation of a double-layered fibrotic and astroglial scar around the collagen scaffold might explain the relatively poor implant-host integration and suggests a mechanism for failed microvessel maturation. Targeted strategies that improve implant-host integration for such biomaterials will be vital for future tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches for traumatic SCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".