Influence of Rider on the Stability and Control of Two Wheeled Vehicles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rider plays an important role in the stability and control of two-wheeled vehicles. The rider model must be designed carefully according to the physical and geometric features of the target two-wheeled vehicle. This paper aims to disclose how the rider affects the control and stability of two-wheeled vehicles. First, the two-wheeled vehicle-rider system was modelled and subjected to dynamic analysis. Next, the motion equations of a two-wheeled vehicle were linearized with forwarding velocity and small disturbances in displacement. Further, the genetic algorithm (GA) was introduced to optimize the parameters of the proportional-integralderivative (PID) controller, taking the steering torque and lean torque from the rider as the inputs. Finally, the PID controller was compared with the PI and PD controllers through simulation of a two-wheeled vehicle-rider system. The results show that the rider plays the role of derivation action; the motion of the upper body of the rider has a secondary impact on vehicle stability; the rider can stabilize the vehicle through both lean and steering torques generated by his/her upper body movements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it