MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992298562 · doi:10.1182/blood.v106.11.558.558

The Mechanism of Rh-Immune Globulin Prophylaxis Involves Significant Increases in the Immunosuppressive Cytokines TGFβ and PGE2.

2005· article· en· W2992298562 on OpenAlexaff
Donald R. Branch, Nicole Lund, Fariba Shabani, Gregory A. Denomme

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemImmunologyImmunosuppressionCytokineAntibodyGlobulinMedicineMechanism of actionImmune toleranceInterleukin 10Internal medicineEndocrinologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For more than 40 years, hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) caused by anti-Rh(D) antibody produced by a pregnant mother to her Rh(D)+ baby has been prevented by Rh(D)-immune globulin prophylaxis. Surprisingly, although a number of theories have been proposed, the mechanism of action of this immunosuppressive treatment remains completely unknown (Kumpel BM, Immunol Lett.2002;82:67–73). One potential mechanism of action is the production of one or several strongly immunosuppressive cytokines capable of blocking a primary immune response. Thus, to begin to unravel the possible mechanism(s) of the immunosuppression induced by administration of Rh(D)-immune globulin, we have examined production of a number of immunomodulatory cytokines following administration of Rh(D)-immune globulin. After informed consent, we measured levels of 17 different cytokines pre- and 48 hours post-administration of 300 μg of anti-Rh(D)(WinRhoSDF) in 10 healthy women candidates for Rh(D)-immune globulin prophylaxis. We used platelet-poor plasma from citrated whole blood and quantitative ELISA having the most sensitive detection limits. We observed no striking changes in levels of the cytokines IL-1 sRII, IL-12 p40, IL-16, or MCP-1. Levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17, MIP-1α, GM-CSF, TNFβ, and IFNγ remained below detection levels both pre- and post-testing. However, IL-1ra levels showed a slight to moderate decrease in 7 of 10 women after Rh(D)-immune globulin administration. In contrast, levels of TGFβ-1 increased, >1.3-fold in 7 of 10 women and >2-fold in 4 of 10 women. In one instance, the increase in TGFβ-1 (42, 855 pg/mL) was >5-fold and this woman also had a significant increase in TGFβ-2 (352 pg/mL). In addition to TGFβ, 4 of 10 women had increases of >1.5-fold in PGE2. Statistical analyses using ANOVA, paired Student’s t-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank, for the combined results of all 10 women receiving Rh(D)-immune globulin indicated that only TGFβ and PGE2 were significantly elevated post administration of Rh(D)-immune globulin. These results indicate that Rh(D)-immune prophylaxis can induce high levels of the strongly immunosuppressive cytokines TGFβ and PGE2. Both of these molecules have been shown to induce profound immunosuppression including prevention of primary immune responses (Ludviksson BR, et al., Eur J Immunol.2000;30:2101–2111; Zhou H, Lamont SJ, Int J Fertil.1986;31:305–310). Our findings represent the first clear evidence for a mechanism of action of Rh(D)-immune prophylaxis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207