Re-membering Mothers as Lifelong Educators: The Art Work of the Woman's Christian Temperance Union
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"I didn't know the White Ribbon had been used previously to Montreal Massacre Remembrance," a visitor wrote in response to the 1999 exhibit of 19th-century banners of the Canadian Woman's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU). My qualitative research into the art work of the Canadian Woman's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) re-evaluates (re-members,) mothers as informal educators of lifelong learning. Memory work and art work are both theoretical framework and research method that constitute the counter-memory methodology of feminist genealogy and resistance to dominant discourses around motherwork, art work, and lifelong learning. My research develops the rhetorical purpose of art work, in which words and images address an-other and stir memory; artful rhetoric joins two memories—speaker and listener, artist and spectator—in a shared moment. Résumé "Je n'étais pas au courant que le ruban blanc avail été employé lors de la journée commémorant la tuerie de l'École polytechnique", a écrit une personne après sa visite de l'exposition de bannières de la section canadienne de la Woman's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU), en 1999. Ma recherche qualitative au sujet d'objets d'art produits par des membres de la WCTU ré-évalue (et re-positionne) les mères en tant qu'éducatrices parallèles en formation continue. Les récits individuels et les objets d'art sont à la fois le cadre théorique et la méthode de recherche qui constituent la méthodologie d'une contre-mémoire de la généalogie et de la resistance féministes contre des discours dominants sur le rôle de la mère, l'art et la formation continue. Ma recherche se penche sur la visée rhétorique de l'art, où mots et images s'interpellent et remuent les souvenirs; une rhétorique habile qui lie les souvenirs des deux acteurs—le locuteur et le récepteur, l'artiste et le spectateur—dans un moment partagé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".