MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992454048

Acoustical challenges for achieving enhanced acoustical performance within schools required by leed

2011· article· en· W2992454048 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Zohreh Razavi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeiling (cloud)ReverberationHVACArchitectural engineeringCore (optical fiber)Space (punctuation)DoorsAcousticsEngineeringComputer scienceRoom acousticsMultimediaTelecommunicationsAir conditioningElectrical engineeringPhysicsMechanical engineeringStructural engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the ANSI 12.6-2002(R2009) standards, a core learning space is defined as a location within building where students assemble for educational purposes such as: classrooms, conference rooms, libraries and music rooms. Spaces where good communication is important but informal learning is the primary function are called ancillary learning spaces which include gymnasiums, cafeterias and corridors. The LEED® minimum acoustical performance - IEQ Prerequisite 3 - is to achieve a maximum background noise level of 45 dBA from HVAC systems within classrooms and core leaning spaces, and for core learning spaces smaller than 566 m3, confirm that 100% of the ceiling or equivalent surface areas are covered with acoustical material achieving NRC of 0.70 or higher. For space larger than 566 m3, the reverberation time should be 1.5 seconds or shorter. The LEED®Enhanced Acoustical Performance - IEQ Credit 9 - is building shell, classroom partitions and other core learning spaces partitions should meet the STC requirements of ANSI S12.6-2002 standard, except windows, which must meet an STC rating of at least 35. Background noise level from HVAC in classrooms and other core learning spaces shouldn't exceed 40 dBA. The main acoustical challenges within schools where achieving enhanced acoustical performance are required by LEED®would be large windows and doors with unknown acoustical performances. A few challenges within schools will be discussed in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207