Breakthrough Hemolysis in Adult Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Treated with Ravulizumab: Results of a 52-Week Extension from Two Phase 3 Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In patients (pts) with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) receiving eculizumab, approximately 11%-27% may experience breakthrough hemolysis (BTH)-the return of hemolytic disease activity. BTH may be associated with inadequate C5 inhibition or complement-activating conditions (CACs; eg, infection). Although there is no broad consensus regarding the definition of BTH, this study defined BTH based on literature review and expert consensus: ≥1 new or worsening sign or symptom of intravascular hemolysis (fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, dyspnea, anemia [hemoglobin <10 g/dL], major adverse vascular event [including thrombosis], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction) in the presence of elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (≥2 × ULN) after prior LDH reduction to <1.5 × ULN on therapy. Ravulizumab, an innovative long-acting C5 complement inhibitor, was recently approved in the United States, Japan, and Europe for the treatment of PNH. In two phase 3 trials, ALXN1210-PNH-301 (301; NCT02946463) and ALXN1210-PNH-302 (302; NCT03056040), ravulizumab (q8w) was shown to be noninferior to eculizumab 900 mg (q2w) for all primary and key secondary endpoints (including BTH). Each study had a 26-wk randomized primary evaluation period, followed by an extension period during which pts could receive ravulizumab for up to 2 y. In the current analysis, pt-level data were evaluated to assess causes and clinical parameters associated with BTH incidences reported up to 1 y in the two phase 3 trials. METHODS The trials were phase 3, randomized, open-label, noninferiority, multicenter studies. Eligible pts were ≥18 y with confirmed PNH diagnosis. Pts in study 301 were naive to C5 inhibitor therapy, with LDH of ≥1.5 × ULN and ≥1 sign/symptom of PNH at screening. Pts in study 302 were stable receiving eculizumab treatment for ≥6 mo, with LDH of ≤1.5 × ULN at screening. Pts received weight-based dosing of ravulizumab q8w or the approved eculizumab dose (900 mg q2w) for 183 d; in the extension, eligible pts continued (R-R arm) or switched to ravulizumab (E-R arm). The outcome of interest was the proportion of pts with BTH during the extensions of 301 and 302 (wks 27-52), causes, and clinical parameters associated with BTH incidents. BTH causation was determined by clinical review and categorized as related to inadequate C5 inhibition (free C5 ≥0.5 μg/mL), CAC due to an inciting event (eg, infection, trauma, surgery), or unrelated to either event. RESULTS Study 301: 243 pts entered the extension period (R-R arm: n=124; E-R arm: n=119). In both groups, 99% of pts who had no BTH during wks 0-26 experienced no BTH incidents during wks 27-52. Four pts in the R-R arm experienced BTH during wks 27-52, of which 3 pts had experienced BTH during wks 0-26. In the E-R arm, there were fewer BTH events during wks 27-52 compared with wks 0-26 (Table A). Two pts experienced BTH after switching to ravulizumab in the E-R arm, of which 1 had experienced BTH during wks 0-26. During wks 27-52, 2 BTH events (1 in each arm) were associated with infection and 4 BTH events in the R-R arm and 1 in the E-R arm were unrelated to free C5 elevation or reported infection. Study 302: 191 pts entered the extension period (R-R arm: n=96; E-R arm: n=95). Of these pts, 97% in the R-R arm and 100% in the E-R arm who had no BTH during wks 0-26 had no BTH incidents during wks 27-52. Three pts in the R-R arm experienced BTH during wks 27-52. In the E-R arm, there were fewer BTH events during wks 27-52 compared with wks 0-26 (Table B). One pt experienced BTH after switching to ravulizumab; this pt previously experienced BTH during wks 0-26. During wks 27-52, 2 BTH events in the R-R arm and 1 event in the E-R arm were associated with infection, and 1 BTH event in the R-R arm was unrelated to free C5 elevation or reported infection. In both studies, no BTH incidents were associated with free C5 of >0.5 μg/mL (the threshold associated with complete inhibition of C5) during wks 27-52 while on ravulizumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS During wks 27-52, in both studies, the number of pts who experienced BTH events was similar to that in wks 0-26 in the R-R group, and fewer pts experienced BTH events after switching from eculizumab to ravulizumab. No BTH events were associated with elevations in free C5 to >0.5 μg/mL in pts taking ravulizumab. Similar numbers of pts initially receiving ravulizumab or eculizumab experienced infection-related BTH events, possibly due to proximal complement activation. Disclosures Hill: Bioverativ: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria; Regeneron: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Apellis: Honoraria; Akari: Honoraria; Ra Pharma: Honoraria. Piatek:Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dova: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Rigel: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding. Peffault de Latour:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Wells:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Brodsky:Achillion: Research Funding; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grant funding. Nishimura:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kuriakose:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy. Pavani:Alexion: Employment. Liu:Alexion: Employment. Ortiz:Alexion: Employment. Schrezenmeier:Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lee:Achillion: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kulasekararaj:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Akari Therapeutics: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Achilleon: Consultancy; Ra Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".