MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992689757

Submacular Choroidal Thickness Evaluation After Laser Photocoagulation For Diabetic Retinopathy

2011· article· en· W2992689757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIrInSubria (University of Insubria) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOphthalmologyMedicineOptometryDiabetic retinopathyLaserOpticsDiabetes mellitusPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract
\n
\nPurpose:To evaluate subfoveal choroidal thickness before and after laser photocoagulation in diabetic retinopathy (DR) visualized by Spectral Domain OCT (SDOCT). 
\n
\nMethods:A total of 15 patients affected by DR were involved in this prospective interventional study. Inclusion criteria comprehend DR complicated by significant macular edema or retinal ischemia. Exclusion criteria include media opacities, other vascular or inflammatory retinal pathologies. Seven patients received scatter laser photocoagulation for proliferative DR and eight patients focal or laser grid photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. By means of a SDOCT (OTI-OPKO, Toronto, Canada) experienced operators measured choroidal thickness in subfoveal area and 3mm away from the fovea in nasal and temporal region, after imaging enhancement procedures. Clinical measurements were performed at baseline, at day 7 and day 14 after laser treatment. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the results. 
\n
\nResults:Choroidal and retinal thickness OCT measurements were performed to all subjects on scheduled visits. Mean choroidal thickness at baseline was respectively 250,7 ± 60,6μm in subfoveal region, 166,4 ± 63μm nasal to fovea and 241,4 ± 66μm temporal to fovea; at day 7 was 280,8 ± 76μm (p=0.01), 180,8 ± 63μm (p>0.05) and 239,2 ± 67μm (p>0.05); at day 15, mean choroidal thickness was 246,3 ± 62μm (p=0.03), 171,8 ± 65μm (p>0.05) and 240 ± 68,8μm (p>0.05). Retinal macular thickness measured underwent to an overall variation during follow up from a baseline value of 286,4±60,01μm to 323±75,9μm at day 7 (p=0.03) and to 310,9±62,01μm at day 15 (p>0.05). 
\n
\nConclusions:Our study showed at day 7 a statistically significant increase of choroidal thickness only in subfoveal region, subsequently decreased at day 14. This observation was associated to a significant increase of retinal thickness at day 7. These observations underline and confirm the involvement of choroidal tissue on different traumatic and inflammatory vitreoretinal events, as well as the role of new SDOCT to better evaluate and measure choroidal structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it