MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992767527

Developments in water resources planning in the United Kingdom: balancing bottom-up and top-down approaches

2019· article· en· W2992767527 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. Tsarouchi, A. McBride, C. Counsell, Matthew Durant

Bibliographic record

VenueEPrints - HR Wallingford (HR Wallingford) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater resourcesWork (physics)Resource (disambiguation)Investment (military)BusinessPopulationQuarter (Canadian coin)Scale (ratio)Water supplyNatural resource economicsEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementWater resource managementEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental scienceGeographyEconomicsEngineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water companies in the United Kingdom are required to produce long-term plans of water resources for their supply area every five years, outlining how they plan to maintain secure and sustainable supplies, taking account of social and environmental impacts as well as economic costs. As a result, the water environment is highly regulated to ensure competing demands are satisfied. A quarter of the population lives in the south-east of the country, with water supplied by six different water companies. This region faces long term challenges of population growth, which is projected to grow at a rate exceeding the national average, and some areas predicted to face water supply deficits in the near future. \nThe recent WaterUK long term planning framework report concluded that large-scale inter-regional transfers of water could offer the best value to securing water resources on a national scale. However, the planning guidelines suggest that the complexity of the water resources planning method applied is proportional to the challenges faced by the individual water company. With the first regional water resource plans programmed for publication in 2022, regional bodies are facing the challenge of amalgamating results from the wide range of methods applied within their region. The absence of a one size fits all approach poses difficulties in assessing and modelling the viability and timing of such schemes. \n \nWe address how water companies and regional bodies are working together to produce integrated regional water resources and investment models to arrive at optimal solutions. Recent work by HR Wallingford demonstrates the benefits and limitations of such an optimised approach, as well as highlighting the initial challenges of planning a strategic inter-basin water transfer from the perspectives of water companies, regulators, and stakeholders in a region facing some of the most challenging water resources issues in the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.333
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPrints - HR Wallingford (HR Wallingford)Same topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207