QUALITY OF SLEEP AND COGNITIVE STATUS IN ACUTE PERIOD OF INSULT AMONG PATIENTS WITH MINIMUM MOTOR DEFICIENCY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim. To assess the correlation between the subjective quality of sleep and the cognitive status in the acute period of insult among patients with minimum motor deficiency. Materials and methods. 67 patients (42 men and 25 women, aged 33–75 years) were examined in the acute period of insult. Neuropsychological study included the following tests: Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Watch Drawing Test (WDT), Words Test (5) (WT), Schulte Table (ST) and categorical Verbal Fluency Test (VF); the quality of sleep was assessed using Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) determination. Results. Neurodynamic, dysmnestic and mixed types of disorders were singled out on the basis of neuropsychical study. Conclusion. The cognitive status and subjective quality of sleep were assessed in 67 patients in the acute period of insult. After insult, patients had a reduced quality of sleep regarding the time of falling asleep, duration, sleep disturbance and day dysfunction. Low quality of sleep correlated with lower indices of verbal and regulatory processes. The most marked sleep disturbances were detected in patients with mixed and dysmnestic variants of cognitive deficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".