Power Doppler enhancement of accessory pulleys confirming disease localization in psoriatic dactylitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The digital accessory pulleys are highly mechanically stressed mini-entheses that are thickened in patients with a history of PsA-related dactylits. This study explored whether these pulleys are involved in PsA dactylitis as assessed by intra-pulley US power Doppler changes. METHODS: Fifty-eight PsA patients with dactylitis had US of the second to fourth digits for pulleys of the dactylitic and contralateral digits. The Leeds Dactylometer was used for thickness measurement. The presence of digital pain, tenderness, and swelling in the dactylitis finger and in the contralateral side was evaluated. RESULTS: We recruited 34 patients with acute and 24 patients with chronic dactylitis, 45/58 (77%) of which had tenderness on clinical assessment. Intra-pulley power Doppler was more frequently found in the dactylitic digits compared with contralateral sides and linked to A1, A2 and A4 pulleys thickening [power Doppler signals in A1 pulley (51%), A2 (22%) and A4 (12%) in dactylitic digit; compared with 1 A1, A2 and A4 pulleys each in the contralateral side (1.7%)]. Almost all cases had peri-tendinous oedema, and 82.6% of dactylitic digits had flexor tenosynovitis with power Doppler signals in 65.2% of flexor tendons. CONCLUSION: Despite their small size and relatively avascular, the accessory pulleys exhibit power Doppler change in active Psoriatic dactylitis, supporting a pivotal role in dactylitis-related tenosynovitis and extra-tendinous disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".