Effects of interlayer and bi-quadratic exchange coupling on layered triangular lattice antiferromagnets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The magnetic field evolution of ground spin states of the stacked planar triangular antiferromagnet with antiferromagnetic interlayer interaction J c is explored using a minimal 3D classical Heisenberg model. A bi-quadratic coupling is also used to mimic the effect of spin fluctuations (Zhitomirsky 2015 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser . 592 012110) which are known to stabilize the magnetization plateau. A single ion anisotropy is included and states with a magnetic field applied in the ab plane and along the c axis are determined. For -plane, an additional new state, in contrast to 2D model (Zhitomirsky 2015 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser . 592 012110), is obtained with weak interlayer interaction, while the magnetization plateau vanishes at large J c and other new states with z components of spins emerge. For -axis, an extra state, compared with 2D model, is obtained with a weak interlayer interaction. When J c is large enough, only the state corresponding to the Umbrella phase in 2D model exits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".