Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Severity Predicts Disease Outcomes in Pediatric Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Reliability and Validity Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has not been assessed as a surrogate biomarker in pediatrics. We aimed to determine the inter‐rater reliability, prognostic utility, and construct validity of the modified Majoie endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography classification applied to MRCP in a pediatric primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) cohort. This single‐center, retrospective, cohort study included children with PSC undergoing diagnostic MRCP between 2008 and 2016. Six variations of the Majoie classification were examined: 1) intrahepatic duct (IHD) score, 2) extrahepatic duct (EHD) score (representing the worst intrahepatic and extrahepatic regions, respectively), 3) sum IHD‐EHD score, 4) average IHD score, 5) average EHD score, and 6) sum average IHD‐EHD score. Inter‐rater reliability was assessed using weighted kappas and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Ability to predict time to PSC‐related complications (ascites, esophageal varices, variceal bleed, liver transplant [LT], or cholangiocarcinoma) (primary outcome) and LT (secondary outcome) was assessed with Harrell’s concordance statistic (c‐statistic) and univariate/multivariable survival analysis. Construct validity was further assessed with Spearman correlations. Forty‐five children were included (67% boys; median, 13.6 years). The inter‐rater reliability of MRCP scores was substantial to excellent (kappas/ICCs, 0.78‐0.82). The sum IHD‐EHD score had the best predictive ability for time to PSC complication and LT (c‐statistic, 0.80 and SE, 0.06; and c‐statistic, 0.97 and SE, 0.01, respectively). Higher MRCP scores were independently associated with a higher rate of PSC‐related complications, even after adjusting for the PSC Mayo risk score (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.14‐2.). MRCP sum scores correlated significantly with METAVIR fibrosis stage, total bilirubin, and platelets ( r = 0.42, r = 0.33, r = −0.31, respectively; P < 0.05). Conclusion: An MRCP score incorporating the worst affected intrahepatic and extrahepatic regions is reliable and predicts meaningful outcomes in pediatric PSC. Next steps include prospective validation and responsiveness assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".