Western historiography of US policy in East Asia in the 19th century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article analyses the main achievements of Western historical scientists in the process of studying U.S. policy in East Asia in the 19th century. The author of the article concludes that, That Western scholars made significant contributions to the study of American politics in East Asia in the 19th century. This is due to, That historians of the United States and European countries understood the importance of exploring the subject, As the Pacific region was in the area of special attention of the leading Western states, Since the first half of the 19th century. That is why a comprehensive and detailed study of various aspects of this issue was considered important for the development of an optimal foreign policy course for the countries of East Asia. The first fundamental studies, which examined the history of American politics in the Pacific Ocean, began to appear in the late 19th — in the first quarter of the 20th century. The article notes that the characteristic feature of the development of Western historiography is that scientists tried not only to cover historical events in detail, but also to make their own recommendations for its optimization and further development. There has also been frequent criticism of White House foreign policy initiatives in East Asia. According to the author, the works of representatives of Western historiography made it possible not only to get acquainted with the actual material, but also to trace the evolution of views on US politics in the 19th century to different stages of the development of American historical thought. In addition, as the analysis of Western historiography showed, the study of East Asian policy of Washington by English-speaking, Chinese and Japanese scientists took place quite dynamically. At the same time, it is necessary to bear in mind the importance of a critical approach in the scientific analysis of these works, as their main task is often to justify the policies of Western States towards the countries of East Asia. At the same time, they provide an opportunity to understand the West's approach to international problems in the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".