Écriture de soi et de l’autre: Récits de filiation et contestation chez Herzog et Picasso
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este articulo analiza como los autores Félicité Herzog y Marina Picasso refutan la imagen publica de su padre y abuello, el excepcional alpinista Maurice Herzog y el gran artista Pablo Picasso en dos ‘‘récits de filiation’’, Un héros y Grand-père. En primer lugar, demuestro que aunque sus acusaciones revelan un comportamiento cruel de estas figuras famosas con su familia, también le ayudan a comprender su sufrimiento durante su infancia. En segundo lugar, demuestro que ambos autores admiten que Maurice Herzog y Pablo Picasso eran victimas de su celebridad y por lo tanto los disculpan en parte.
 Al final, aunque los autores rechazan la filiación del hombre corrupto por su celebridad, aceptan la filiación del padre alpinista excepcional y del abuelo artista novator. This paper examines the way in which Félicité Herzog and Marina Picasso challenge the public images of their father and grand-father, the exceptional mountaineer Maurice Herzog and the great artist Pablo Picasso, respectively, in two ‘‘récits de filiation’’, Un Héros and Grand-père. I first show that while the authors’ accusations unveil a cruel attitude from these two renowned figures towards their relatives, they also act as an outlet to help them understand their own suffering as children. Second, I show that both authors recognize that Maurice Herzog and Pablo Picasso were victims of their fame, therefore partly excusing them. Thus, although the authors reject the filiation of those individuals corrupted by their celebrity, they accept the filiation of a father, an exceptional mountaineer, and a grandfather, the unique painter. Este articulo analiza como los autores Félicité Herzog y Marina Picasso refutan la imagen publica de su padre y abuello, el excepcional alpinista Maurice Herzog y el gran artista Pablo Picasso en dos ‘‘récits de filiation’’, Un héros y Grand-père. En primer lugar, demuestro que aunque sus acusaciones revelan un comportamiento cruel de estas figuras famosas con su familia, también le ayudan a comprender su sufrimiento durante su infancia. En segundo lugar, demuestro que ambos autores admiten que Maurice Herzog y Pablo Picasso eran victimas de su celebridad y por lo tanto los disculpan en parte.
 Al final, aunque los autores rechazan la filiación del hombre corrupto por su celebridad, aceptan la filiación del padre alpinista excepcional y del abuelo artista novator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".