MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993389357 · doi:10.2175/193864700785140944

Start-Up, Operation and Performance of an Optimized Real time Control System for Wet Weather Pollution Control

2000· article· en· W2993389357 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pierre Lavallée, Richard Bonin, Bruno Roy, Geneviève Pelletier, Martin Pleau

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Water Environment Federation · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombined sewerControl (management)Environmental scienceComputer scienceMeteorologyPollutionReal-time Control SystemReal-time computingGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Start-Up, Operation and Performance of an Optimized Real time Control System for Wet Weather Pollution ControlDoes the Real Time Control System really achieve better performance in terms of controlling overflows in combined sewer systems? Is it more efficient than the decisions of a human operator? Is it sufficiently robust? These are some of the questions that will be covered in this paper on the implementation and the performance of the RTC system installed for the Quebec Urban Community (QUC).Author(s)Pierre LavalléeRichard BoninBruno RoyGenevieve PelletierMartin PleauSourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationSubjectSession 2 - CS OperationsDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Jan, 2000ISSN1938-6478SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:4L.36;1-DOI10.2175/193864700785140944Volume / Issue2000 / 4Content sourceCollection Systems ConferenceFirst / last page(s)36 - 49Copyright2000Word count80

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Water Environment FederationSame topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207