Design and Start-up of North America's First Sidestream Nitrogen Removal Plant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Design and Start-up of North America's First Sidestream Nitrogen Removal PlantThere are three wastewater treatment plants in the City of Winnipeg. Undigested solids from the three plants are processed centrally at the North End Water Pollution Control Centre (NEWPCC). Raw solids are added to mesophilic anaerobic digesters and the digested solids dewatered using centrifuges. The centrate from the centrifuges is discharged to the head-end of the NEWPCC. Although the centrate...Author(s)Simon BakerYoomin LeeDoug TaniguchiNicholas SzokeAllan ZaleskiJan OleszkiewiczSourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationSubjectSession 13 - BNR and ENR Case StudiesDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Jan, 2009ISSN1938-6478SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:4L.1002;1-DOI10.2175/193864709793901617Volume / Issue2009 / 4Content sourceNutrient Removal and Recovery SymposiumFirst / last page(s)1002 - 1012Copyright2009Word count197Subject keywordsSidestreamcentratebioaugmentationnitrificationdenitrificationnitrogen removal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".