MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2993405832 · doi:10.1101/786707

Gray matter volume and estimated brain age gap are not associated with sleep-disordered breathing in subjects from the ADNI cohort

2019· preprint· en· W2993405832 on OpenAlexafffund
Bahram Mohajer, Nooshin Abbasi, Esmaeil Mohammadi, Habibolah Khazaie, Ricardo S. Osorio, Ivana Rosenzweig, Claudia R. Eickhoff, Mojtaba Zarei, Masoud Tahmasian, Simon B. Eickhoff

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerBiogenBioClinicaF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaEli Lilly and CompanyU.S. Department of DefenseMeso Scale DiagnosticsAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationBristol-Myers SquibbNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's AssociationFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsVoxel-based morphometryNeuroimagingGray (unit)CohortBrain sizeGrey matterCognitive declineSleep disordered breathingPsychologyEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceVoxelCognitionAudiologyMedicineInternal medicineMagnetic resonance imagingWhite matterDiseaseDementiaNuclear medicineNeuroscienceRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) are prevalent conditions with rising burden. It is suggested that SDB may contribute to cognitive decline and advanced aging. Here, we assessed the link between self-reported SDB and gray matter volume in patients with AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and healthy controls (HC). We further investigated whether SDB was associated with advanced brain aging. We included a total of 330 participants, divided based on self-reported history of SDB, and matched across diagnoses for age, sex and presence of the ApoE4 allele, from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Gray-matter volume was measured using voxel-wise morphometry and differences reflecting SDB, cognitive status, and their interaction were evaluated. Further, using an age-prediction model fitted on gray-matter data of external datasets, we predicted study participants’ age from their structural scans. Cognitive decline (MCI/AD diagnosis) and advanced age were associated with lower gray matter volume in various regions, particularly in the bilateral temporal lobes. BrainAGE was well predicted from the morphological data in HC and, as expected, elevated in MCI and particularly in AD. However, there was neither a significant difference between regional gray matter volume in any diagnostic group related to the SDB status nor an SDB-by-cognitive status interaction. Also, we found neither a significant difference in BrainAGE gap (estimated - chronological age) related to SDB nor an SDB-by-cognitive status interaction. In summary, contrary to our expectations, we were not able to find a general nor a diagnostic specific effect on either gray-matter volumetric or brain aging. Statement of significance Dementia syndromes including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), are a major global concern, and unraveling modifiable predisposing risk factors is indispensable. Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and its most prevalent form, obstructive sleep apnea, are suggested as modifiable risk factors of AD, but their contribution to AD hallmarks, like brain atrophy and advanced brain aging, is not clear to this day. While self-reported SDB is suggested to propagate aging process and cognitive decline to AD in clinical studies, here, we demonstrated that, SDB might not necessarily associate to brain atrophy and the advanced brain aging assessed by morphological data, in AD progession. However, multimodal longitudinal studies with polysomnographic assessment of SDB are needed to confirm such fundings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research→French-language works237,207→