MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993431008 · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.32004.45440

Raptor Trapping At Wise Point Station: Year 2003 Report

2004· article· en· W2993431008 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bryan D. Watts

Bibliographic record

VenueW&M Publish (College of William & Mary) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVirginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries
KeywordsGeographyEnvironmental scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large numbers of diurnal raptors from breeding populations across northern latitudes migrate south along the Atlantic flyway to reach winter destinations from southeastern North America to southern South America. Many of these birds become concentrated within geographic bottlenecks where they rest and forage. Each fall since 1978, staff, students, and associates of the Center for Conservation Biology at the College of William and Mary have trapped diurnal raptors near the tip of the Lower Delmarva Peninsula. The research objectives of this project continue to be 1) to monitor trends in the migration of several raptor species, 2) to learn more about the natural history of migratory raptors, and 3) to add to our understanding of migratory movements and pathways. During the fall of 2003, the Wise Point Station was operated on 52 days between 9 September and 23 November for a total of 359 hours. A combination of mist nets, bow nets, and dho-gaza nets were used in conjunction with lure birds to trap migrating raptors. A total of 516 raptors of seven species was banded resulting in an overall capture rate of 1.4 birds/operation hr. The project has recorded lower overall capture rates in only 2 of the previous 15 years. The 2003 season continued a downward trend in overall capture rate. Since 1989, capture rate has declined significantly at an average rate of approximately 6%/year. A decline in the capture rate of Sharp-shinned Hawks appears to be solely responsible for the decline in overall rate. The proportion of total captures accounted for by Sharp-shins has declined from more than 60% of total captures in the early 1990’s to less than 30% in recent years. The population-level implications of continued declines in capture rates for Sharp-shinned Hawks within the mid-Atlantic remain unclear. Six birds that were banded at Wise Point during the 2003 season have been recovered elsewhere. This includes 2 Sharp-shinned Hawks, 3 Cooper’s Hawks, and 1 Merlin. Recoveries ranged from Dover Delaware to Marathon Florida. The Merlin was banded on the 8th of October and recovered in Marathon, FL just 6 days later. A total of 19 birds were captured that had been banded previously elsewhere. These included a young, male Peregrine that was color banded in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueW&M Publish (College of William & Mary)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207