Efficacy of Biocontrol Agents Beauveria bassiana and Plant Extracts on Dactylopius opuntiae Cockerell (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Opuntia ficus-indica is a cactus used as fodder for animals in arid areas worldwide. However, the palm is parasitized by the carmine cochineal scale insect (Dactylopius opuntiae) causing great damage to cactus plantations in the semi-arid region of Brazil. Leaf extracts aqueous and hydro-ethanolic of neem and citronella at concentrations of 50, 100 and 200 mg/mL, and strains suspensions of Beauveria bassiana (1 × 108 conidia/mL); were applied on cladodes infested by D. opuntiae, in the laboratory. After 10 days of treatment, the percentages of mortality were obtained on the adult females. Then, the most efficient extracts were selected in the laboratory tests for control tests in palm plantation, where 100 mL of the extracts were applied in the 100 mg/mL concentration on cladodes of palms. The results show that B. bassiana strains were not pathogenic to D. opuntiae. Only the aqueous and hydro-ethanolic neem extracts were effective in controlling the cochineal. We conclude that neem extracts are effective against D. opuntiae and can be used to control carmine scale in Opuntia ficus-indica in the field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".