Trial effectiveness of daily and flexible administration of micronutrient sprinkles to control anaemia in young children in rural Bangladesh
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Iron deficiency-anaemia is a major public health problem worldwide, especially in developing \ncountries. Infants and young children aged between 6-24 months are one of the most \nvulnerable groups. Although iron intervention programme, such as iron-folate tablets, have \nbeen implemented for pregnant women at the national level in many countries, a suitable \neffective public health strategy to control childhood anaemia remains to be established. In \nresponse to this need, researchers at the Hospital for Sick Children and the University of \nToronto in Canada developed "Sprinkles", an innovative 'home-fortification' strategy. \nSprinkles consist of microencapsulated iron (as ferrous fumarate) and other essential \nmicronutrients in powder fonn that are packed into single serve sachets, which are to be mixed \ninto any kind of weaning food right before serving. The efficacy of Sprinkles in improving \nanaemia status of young children has been tested in several countries around the world. A \nprevious efficacy trial in Bangladesh, testing daily and weekly administration of Sprinkles, \nrevealed in focus group discussions that caregivers preferred more flexible instructions for \nSprinkles use. Therefore, in this study, the flexible administration of Sprinkles was examined \non the basis that it may increase programme effectiveness by improving adherence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it