Des expériences d’accompagnement en histoire de vie dans le contexte de la formation à distance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte présente deux expériences d’accompagnement en histoire de vie dans le contexte de la formation à distance, dont l’une se réalise en groupe (Projet Persiste) et l’autre, individuellement dans le cadre d’un cours du programme de diplôme d’études supérieures (DESS) en santé mentale à la Télé-université au Québec. L’objectif de cet article est de présenter les particularités de l’accompagnement en histoire de vie dans ce contexte de formation à distance. Les expériences relatées sont analysées à la lumière des caractéristiques de ce contexte dont celles de la communication et des relations qui sont établies entre les participants. De manière plus spécifique l’analyse porte sur le type de relation d’accompagnement et sur des éléments du contexte de la situation de communication tels l’espace et le temps à partir d’études récentes sur les rapports individuels et sociaux dans le contexte du cyberespace. Nous proposons ensuite une réflexion sur le rôle de l’accompagnateur et sur les enjeux de la démarche d’histoire de vie dans le contexte de la formation à distance caractérisée par la communication virtuelle. This article presents two life-story accompanying experiments in the context of distance education. One experiment was carried out in a group (Project Persiste) and the other individually in a course setting in the mental health graduate studies diploma program (programme de diplôme d’études supérieures, DESS) at Télé-université in Québec. This article presents the particularities of life-story accompaniment (providing support) in a distance education context. The experiments presented are analyzed in the light of the characteristics of the context, which include communication and relationships between participants. More specifically, it analyzes the type of accompanying relationship and the situation of communication context elements such as space and time based on recent studies on individual and social relations in the context of cyberspace. We then propose reflection on the accompanying person and on the life-story approach in the context of distance education that is characterized by virtual communication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".