The New Creation as a People an City In Revelation 21:1-22:5: An Alternative to Despair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rev 21: 1-22:5 portrays God making all things new, symbolizing newness via the image of a city called the New Jerusalem in which faithful servants dwell.Yet, many people find it difficult to be hopeful regarding the future.Before interpreting Revelation, it is essential to consider three misreadings of the future to appreciate the hope that throbs within Revelation's vision of New Creation.' I. THREE MISREADINGS OF THE FUTURE. A. Despair and CynicismTracy Chapman, an American blues-folk singer born in 1964,1 and Douglas John Hall, a retired Canadian Lutheran systematic theologian, both posit despair, or the inability to dream anymore, as a basic symptom of the Western cultural crisis.In "If These Are the Things,") Chapman repeats the refrain four times, "If these are the things that dreams are made of, Why don't I dream anymore?"She croons, "we lose old memories but dreams are what life's worth living for.I wish I could dream once more."Seven times in the short song she asks, "Why don't I dream anymore?"Her lament "Why?,,4 exposes the injustice in the world.Why do the babies starve when there's enough food to feed the world?Why when there are so many of us are there people still alone?Why are the missiles called peace keepers when they're armed to kill?Why is a woman still not safe when she's in her home?like Chapman because she asks prophetic questions, as in "Why?" yet she leaves this listener with an awareness of the despair and cynicism which John E. Stanley is professor of New Testament at Messiah College in Grantham, Pa.His research has considered parallels between contemporary music and biblical wisdom literature; Book of Revelation; and women in the Bible and ministry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.081 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".