MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Strategy for Expanding Primitive Leukemic Cells from Chronic Phase CML Patients by Forced Overexpression of a NUP98-HOXA10 Homeodomain Fusion Gene.

2008· article· en· W2994442551 on OpenAlexaff
Ivan Sloma, Suzan Imren, Yun Zhao, R. Keith Humphries, Connie J. Eaves

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsTerry Fox Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone marrowHaematopoiesisCD34Stem cellBiologyHomeoboxFusion geneLeukemiaImmunologyCancer researchMolecular biologyGeneCell biologyGene expressionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Analysis of the leukemic stem cell compartment in CML patients with chronic phase disease remains a major challenge. This is due to the usually low frequency of these cells in the bone marrow and blood of most patients regardless of the WBC count and the fact that they are typically outnumbered by normal hematopoietic stem cells from which they cannot be currently separated. Moreover, thus far it has not been possible to identify conditions for their selective expansion in vitro or in vivo. To pursue this goal, we have begun to explore the effects of certain HOX gene-containing constructs on primitive chronic phase CML cells based on previous evidence that these genes markedly enhance the expansion of primitive normal murine and human cord blood cell numbers without inducing leukemia. Lineage-negative peripheral blood or bone marrow cells from 3 chronic phase CML patients (with >93%, <20% and <6% Ph+ LTC-ICs by G-banding karyotyping) were pre-stimulated overnight in a medium containing a serum substitute and 100 ng/ml hSteel Factor (SF), 100 ng/ml hFlt3-ligand and 20 ng/ml each of hIL-3, hIL-6 and hG-CSF. Cells were then exposed to a lenti-PGK-GFP virus with or without an upstream MDUS-NUP98-HOXA10 homeodomain (HD) element for 5 hours in the same medium. After removal of the virus, the cells were maintained in culture under the same conditions for 2 more days to allow full expression of the transduced genes. At this point, both cultures contained the same number of total cells, GFP+ cells and clonogenic progenitors (BFU-E + CFU-GM + CFU-GEMM); i.e., 2.2±0.5 x105 vs 2.2±0.6 x105 total cells, 1.0±0.2 x105 vs 1.3±0.3 x105 GFP+ cells, 3.6±1.7 x104 vs 3.4±1.7 x104 total CFCs and 1.7±0.9 x104 vs 2.4±1.3 x104 GFP+ CFCs per 105 starting lin- cells. However, after the 2-day post-transduction, cells had been maintained for 6 weeks in longterm cultures (LTCs) containing murine stromal cells producing hIL-3, hSF and hG-CSF, we noted a markedly higher (4 to 74-fold) output of CFCs from the NUP98-HOXA10HD-transduced cells. Moreover, whereas the proportion of GFP+ CFCs in the 2-day post-transduction cultures was on average only 31% and 48 % for the control and tested cells respectively, this increased to >98% in the 6-week LTCs initiated with cells that were overexpressing NUP98-HOXA10HD but remained constant at 39% in the control LTCs - suggesting a significant growth advantage conferred by the NUP98A10HD transgene. Importantly, RT-PCR genotyping of the colonies in these assays showed the majority of LTC-IC-derived CFCs from the NUP98-HOXA10HD-transduced cells to be BCR-ABL+, indicative of an even greater output of CFCs by the NUP98-HOXA10HD transduced BCR-ABL+ vs normal cells. These results highlight the potential of NUP98-HOXA10HD to selectively expand primitive CML cells isolated directly from chronic phase patients which will facilitate their further investigation and use to screen and validate new therapeutic agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207