MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994463773

The Determinants of Academic Performance: Hong Kong Immigrant Students in Canadian Schools

2000· article· en· W2994463773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Henry P. H. Chow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationHuman capitalEducational attainmentSociologySocial capitalPopulationHumanitiesDemographic economicsPolitical scienceDemographySocial scienceEconomic growthEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT/RESUME Using the concepts of financial capital, human capital, and social capital, this article attempts to disentangle the major factors which affected the academic performance of 368 recent Hong Kong immigrant students attending 26 different public high schools in Toronto. Results of the ordinary-least square regression analysis indicated that presence of father in Canada, higher self-rated socio-economic status, immigration to Canada being politically motivated, and higher level of English proficiency were significantly and positively related to academic performance. A partir des concepts de capital financier, capital humain et capital social, cet article vise a degager les principaux facteurs qui affectent la performance academique de 368 etudiants immigres recemment de Hong Kong et inscrits dans 26 ecoles secondaires publiques differentes de Toronto. Les resultats d'une analyse de regression revelent que la presence du pere au Canada, le statut socio-economique eleve. l'immigration au Canada motive par des facteurs politiques de meme que le niveau eleve d'habiletes en anglais sont positivement et significativement relies a la performance academique. INTRODUCTION Educational success is one of the primary goals that immigrant students strive to attain. The importance of educational values and work orientation as an aspect of the Chinese culture is widely recognized. There is a wealth of studies documenting the extra-ordinary educational attainment of the Asian population, including the Chinese, in the United States (e.g., Chen & Stevenson, 1995; Mizokakawa & Ryckman, 1990; Stevenson et al., 1985). As academic performance is generally regarded as an early indicator of success for immigrant students and serves as a preparation for the future in a career, educational researchers and practitioners have long been interested in understanding the link between students' family background and academic performance (e.g., Astone & McLanahan, 1991; Reitzes & Mutran, 1980; Valenzuela & Dornbusch, 1994). Family background, according to Coleman (1988), is analytically separable into at least three distinct components: financial capital, human capital, and social capital. More specifically, physical resources that aid achievement, which is commonly measured by the family's wealth or income, are considered as financial capital. Human capital, which constitutes the potential for a cognitive environment that is conducive to children's learning, is usually measured by parents' education. Social capital is the least tangible as it exists only in the relationships among persons and is defined by its function. In view of the paucity of research on the academic performance of immigrant students in Canada and the continual influx of Chinese immigrants to this country,' this analysis fills a gap in the literature by examining the factors associated with the academic performance of Hong Kong immigrant high school students in Toronto. METHODOLOGY This analysis is based on data from a larger study which investigated the adaptation experiences of immigrant students from Hong Kong (see Chow, 1997). A total of 368 Hong Kong immigrant students attending 26 public high schools in Metro Toronto participated in this study by completing a self-administered questionnaire. The two major eligibility criteria for participation in the study included length of residence in Canada being less than five years and legal status in Canada being a permanent resident (i.e., landed immigrant or citizen). The sample comprised 176 male (48.0 percent) and 191 female (52.0 percent) students, with a mean age of 17.8 (SD=2.8). Prior to emigration, about three-quarters of the sample (75.2 percent) had completed secondary education (i.e., Forms 1-5) and slightly more than a third of the students (34.0 percent) attended high schools in which English was the primary medium of instruction. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207