MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994586455

Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector: Comment

2016· article· en· W2994586455 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Morley Gunderson, Robert Hebdon, Douglas Hyatt

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Economic Review · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArbitrationEconomicsCollective bargainingLegislationCompulsory arbitrationWageWage bargainingLabour economicsPublic sectorEmpirical evidencePublic economicsLaw and economicsLawPolitical scienceEconomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a recent paper, Janet Currie and Sheena McConnell ( 1991 ), hereafter CM, provide evidence from the Canadian public sector suggesting that requiring binding wage as opposed to granting the right to strike reduces dispute costs but increases wage costs. Disputes are defined as either an or a strike. This leads them to conclude that Pareto dominates other forms of legal structure: both parties could potentially be made better off from the reduction in dispute costs associated with compulsory arbitration and those responsible for designing collective-bargaining legislation face a trade-off between reducing dispute costs and changing the division of the rent (p. 714). They base these important policy conclusions on their empirical evidence on the following relationships:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.018
Scholarly communication0.0080.017
Open science0.0090.006
Research integrity0.0750.051
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Economic ReviewSame topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207