SOCIAL FUNCTIONING OF PATIENTS WITH HALLUCINATORY-PA RANOID DISORDERS IN SEVERE VASCULAR DEMENTIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a study of the features of the social functioning of patients with hallucinatory-paranoid disorders in severe vascular dementia, 63 patients took part. 34 patients with HPD (main group) and 29 patients without hallucinatory-paranoid disorders (control group). The study was applied a comprehensive approach that was implemented with help a clinical and psychopathological method, supplemented with using of psychometric scales (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) scale, Global Assessment Functionally (GAF) scale, life limitation scale Psychiatric Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS), Bristol Activity Daily Life Scale (BADL) and mathematical-statistical method. Cognitive impairments of patients with hallucinatory-paranoid disorders in severe vascular dementia were characterized by greater severity of praxis disorders (impaired visual-constructive skills), attention (stability), speech (error repetition of phrases and impaired speech speed) and orientation in space and location. The great negative impact of the hallucinatory-paranoid disorders on the self-care function, the effectiveness and necessity of activities in the family and at home, and the fulfillment of the family role has been established. It was defined pronounced effect of psychotic disorders on the formation in patients of this group of restrictions on their vital functions in orientation on the spot. Also it was established influence of psychotic disorders on the formation in patients of this group of limitations of their life activity in orientation in the place, in the skills of eating, self-care, work at home / garden. Obtained data on the social functioning of patients with hallucinatory-paranoid disorders in severe vascular dementia, allow to identify the main problems of their social and everyday functioning and to develop a personalized program of psychosocial rehabilitation of patients with psychotic disorders in dementia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".