MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association Between Hospital Teaching Status and Outcomes After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

2019· article· en· W2994872726 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew Czarnecki, Feng Qiu, Maria Koh, Sheldon Cheskes, Paul Dorian, Damon C. Scales, Dennis T. Ko

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalSunnybrook HospitalCancer Care OntarioInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioOddsLogistic regressionReferralRetrospective cohort studyMyocardial infarctionTertiary referral hospitalEmergency medicinePopulationInternal medicineFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Controversy exists about how best to organize systems of care for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), as little evidence exists to guide policy-makers. In Canada, teaching hospitals are mainly cardiac referral centers that are potentially well suited towards treating patients with OHCA. Our objective was to determine whether patients with OHCA are more likely to survive if they present to teaching hospitals. Methods and Results: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study by linking several population-based administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. All patients >20 years old who arrived alive to hospital after OHCA between April 1, 2007, and March 31, 2014, were eligible for inclusion. Patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. The primary outcome was survival at 30 days. To determine the association between teaching status and 30-day survival, logistic regression models were used to adjust for baseline differences in patient characteristics. Prespecified analysis was performed stratified by age: ≤65, 66 to 80, and >80 years old. A total of 25 346 patients were included: 5413 at teaching and 19 933 at nonteaching hospitals. Survival at 30 days was 13.9% in teaching and 11.0% ( P <0.001) in nonteaching hospitals. Hospital teaching status was associated with a significantly higher adjusted odds of 30-day survival (odds ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.14–1.67]). This improvement in survival was observed in younger patients (≤65 years: odds ratio, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.14–1.74]; 66 to 80 years: odds ratio,1.37 [95% CI, 1.13–1.67]), but there was no significant difference in the elderly (>80 years: odds ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.79–1.44]). Conclusions: Patients with OHCA treated at teaching hospitals were more likely to survive to 30 days. These findings support current recommendations suggesting that treatment of these patients should be provided at specialized hospitals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207