MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994877128

The RatCAP front-end electronics

2008· article· en· W2994877128 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J.‐F. Pratte

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBrookhaven National LaboratoryBiological and Environmental ResearchCMC MicrosystemsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaStony Brook UniversityFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsElectronicsFront and back endsFront (military)Computer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Center for Translational Neuroimaging of the Brookhaven National Laboratory has been studying the phenomenon of addiction, which has a direct impact on millions of people worldwide. This requires the development of new radiotracers for imaging specific neurotransmitter systems in the brain, and the design and implementation of novel imaging devices to measure the neuroactivity of the brain. The RatCAP, or Rat Conscious Animal Positron Emission Tomography (PET), is a head-mounted miniature PET scanner for brain metabolism imaging of awake rats with minimal mobility restriction to enable correlation with the animal's behavior. The RatCAP detector is based on LSO scintillator crystals and avalanche photodiode (APD) arrays. The design of the RatCAP imposed stringent requirements on the readout electronics. First, due to its size and limited power budget, VLSI of the front-end electronics was mandatory. Second, due to the weak signal to noise ratio from the APD detectors, the analog front-end noise had to be minimized, within the power budget, to provide the best possible timing resolution. Finally, the number of interconnections with the data acquisition system had to be minimal in order to maximize the animal's mobility. This thesis presents the design and implementation of the ASIC for the RatCAP. The final ASIC integrates 32 channels consisting of a charge sensitive preamplifier, programmable gain, a bipolar shaping amplifier, and timing and energy discriminators. A novel 32-to-1 address and timing serial encoder is integrated on-chip to multiplex the acquired data through a single output. The ASIC was realized in 0.18 [mu]m CMOS technology from TSMC, has a size of 3.3 mm × 4.5 mm, and power consumption of 117 mW. The ASIC is fully operational. Noise characterization led to a measured equivalent noise charge of 650 electrons rms with the APD biased at the input. A coincidence timing resolution of 6.7 ns FWHM was measured between two typical LSO-APD-ASIC modules using a 68 Ge source (threshold at 420 keV). An energy resolution of 18.7% FWHM at 511 keV was measured for a 68 Ge source. The ASIC and the technology developed for the RatCAP have opened the door to the realization of many other systems, such as a PET-MRI scanner, and led to the granting of three patents and the publication of numerous scientific presentations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207