MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994922540 · doi:10.1093/ageing/afz164.95

95 Associated Factors and Outcomes of Falls in Acute Elderly Inpatients

2019· article· en· W2994922540 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carmen Spiegel, Diane Warren, Denise McCall, Kristine Berry, Tien K. Khoo

Bibliographic record

VenueAge and Ageing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Disease Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDeliriumDementiaMedical recordCohortEmergency medicinePopulationIncident reportPediatricsDiseaseInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction It is thought that more than 1:3 individuals ≥65 years old fall at least once per year. With an increasing number of elderly inpatients in an ageing Australian population, falls prevention is now part of patient safety. We aimed to characterise associated factors of inpatient falls and patient outcomes in an acute medical ward in a regional hospital. Methodology Inpatient falls for a 12-month duration (January-December 2018) were identified through a mandatory incident reporting system. Identifiable cases were included in the study with medical records reviewed retrospectively to ascertain active medical issues. Individuals with recurrent falls in the same admission were only counted once. Statistical analyses were performed in cases which completed an Ontario Modified Stratify (Sydney Scoring) Falls Risk Screen (OMS) during admission. An OMS score of ≥9 was indicative of high falls risk (HFR). Active issues were categorised based on major diagnostic categories. Results A total of 77 falls occurred during the 12-month period. Fifty three events fulfilled criteria for further analyses. This comprised of 24 (45.3%) males and 29 (54.7%) females once recurrent fallers were accounted. The mean cohort age was 80.2 years (SD 13.6) with a mean OMS score of 14.3 (SD 8.6) whereby 63.0% were deemed HFR. The top six categories of active issues experienced in this group were history of fall(s) contributing to admission (47.2%), cognitive impairment/ delirium/ dementia (43.4%), infection (43.4%), significant orthopaedic/ rheumatological disorders (39.6%), ischaemic heart disease/ heart failure/ valvulopathy (34%) and hypertension (34%). Medical admission outcomes for inpatient fallers were as follows; 58.5% discharged, 22.6% transferred to subacute care, 3.8% interhospital transfer and 15.1% death. Conclusion Recommended cut-off scores for the OMS are likely suboptimal in multimorbid elderly acute medical inpatients. Based on the limited sample size, elderly inpatients who experienced in-hospital falls are at higher risk of mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAge and AgeingSame topicChronic Disease Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207