Pocket-creation method using a new technique of single-clip traction for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging procedure used in the removal of colorectal neoplasms and various methods have been developed to improve its performance [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ]. Among these, the pocket-creation method (PCM) allows the safe and efficient removal of neoplastic lesions, using precise submucosal dissection just above the muscularis propria [ 4 ] [ 5 ]. However, the pocket-opening phase of PCM is often cumbersome and time-consuming. We have invented a new technique using single-clip traction that we have called PCM with clip traction (PCM-CT), which we believe improves the speed and safety of the pocket-opening phase. PCM-CT creates submucosal traction by using a single hemoclip to affix normal mucosa from the distal side of the lesion to normal mucosa on the opposite colonic wall ([ Fig. 1 ]). This elongates the submucosa, enabling clearer identification of the safest submucosal dissection line. Fig. 1 Illustration of the pocket-creation method with clip traction (PCM-CT). a – c The submucosa below the lesion is dissected using the PCM; d a circumferential mucosal incision is created around the lesion; e, f a reopenable hemoclip is used to grasp normal mucosa on the distal edge of the partially resected lesion, without deployment; g the entrapped mucosa is pulled towards the normal mucosa on the opposite intestinal wall; h the hemoclip is slowly reopened to capture the opposing normal mucosa and the clip is deployed; i the remaining submucosa below the lesion is dissected with reliable identification of the safest submucosal dissection line. A 20-mm, Paris IIa, nongranular, JNET 2B, laterally spreading lesion in the proximal ascending colon (diagnosed on pathology as being a well differentiated slightly invasive submucosal adenocarcinoma with a 400-µm invasion depth, negative lymphovascular invasion, and negative margins) was removed using the PCM-CT ([ Fig. 2 ]; [ Video 1 ]). As per the standard PCM, a submucosal pocket was first created below the lesion. Next, a circumferential mucosal incision was performed approximately 7 mm outside the margin of the lesion. A reopenable hemoclip (SureClip; Micro-Tech Co. Ltd., NanJing, China) was used to grasp normal mucosa on the distal edge of the partially resected lesion, without being deployed. The resulting entrapped mucosa was then pulled towards the opposite colonic wall, where the hemoclip was carefully reopened to capture the opposing normal colonic mucosa. Once it was confirmed that both mucosal sites had been secured, the hemoclip was deployed. The remaining submucosa beneath the lesion was then dissected and the lesion was safely removed. Fig. 2 Endoscopic images showing: a a 20-mm, Paris IIa, nongranular, JNET 2B, laterally spreading lesion in the ascending colon; b colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) being performed using the pocket-creation method (PCM); c a circumferential incision being made in the normal mucosa around the lesion after the submucosal pocket has been created; d normal mucosa on the distal edge of the lesion being captured with a reopenable clip; e the clip, with the captured mucosa from the edge of the lesion, being pulled towards the opposite colonic wall and reopened to entrap the opposing normal colonic mucosa as well; f the identification of the safest submucosal dissection line, which is improved after PCM with clip traction. Video 1 The pocket-creation method with clip traction (PCM-CT) is performed on a 20-mm laterally spreading lesion in the proximal ascending colon. Quality: mobile 360 480 720 Download In conclusion, PCM-CT provides continuous submucosal traction on lesions by stretching the submucosa and allowing clearer identification of the safest submucosal resection path. This technique facilitates the pocket-opening stage of PCM and potentially improves its safety and efficiency. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".