MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995174355 · doi:10.1525/lavc.2019.140006

Dialogues

2019· article· en· W2995174355 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueLatin American and Latinx Visual Culture · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRhetoric and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousSociologyRepresentation (politics)Visual anthropologyEthnographyDisciplineMateriality (auditing)Media studiesContext (archaeology)Latin AmericansPolitical scienceVisual artsHumanitiesSocial scienceArtAnthropologyPoliticsAestheticsHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The essays in this Dialogues explore the expression of Latin American visual culture in the context of resource extraction and related conflicts over water, land, and community rights. The contributors to the forum—whose diverse disciplinary and professional backgrounds connect art history, anthropology, photography, and activism—consider how creative work in different media can convey the contradictions, ambiguities, and fluid nature of people's relationship with extractive industries. The essays explore how these forms of representation challenge both popular and academic ideas about resource conflicts. Some of the essays describe nonconventional forms of research dissemination, such as an exhibition on extractive landscapes featuring Peruvian contemporary visual artists and a book project about Colombian mining that combines documentary photography and ethnographic writing. Other essays explore the use of images and media technologies in campaigns against mineral and oil extraction in Peru and Ecuador, which sometimes rely on symbols of class struggle or indigeneity. The essays also explore the international reverberations of these campaigns and their influence on solidary activism, including the uncomfortable exchanges and uneasy alliances that result. The contributors critically examine innovative forms of translation and collaboration among scholars, activists, indigenous and environmental organizations, artists, journalists, and community members, as well as the tensions that may result from these collective endeavors. Together, the set of essays contribute to ongoing interdisciplinary discussion on three themes: representation, materiality, and translation. RESUMEN Los ensayos en estos diálogos exploran la expresión de la cultura visual latinoamericana en el contexto de la extracción de recursos, y similares conflictos sobre el agua, la tierra y los derechos comunitarios. Los colaboradores del foro, cuyas diversas trayectorias prácticas y profesionales relacionan la historia del arte, la antropología, la fotografía y el activismo, consideran cómo el trabajo creativo en diferentes medios puede transmitir las contradicciones, las ambigüedades y el carácter fluido de la relación entre personas e industrias extractivas. Los ensayos exploran cómo estas formas de representación cuestionan ideas populares y académicas sobre los conflictos de recursos. Algunos de los ensayos describen formas no convencionales de difusión de la investigación, como una exposición sobre paisajes extractivos con artistas visuales contemporáneos peruanos y un proyecto de libro sobre minería colombiana que combina fotografía documental y escritura etnográfica. Otros ensayos exploran el uso de imágenes y tecnologías de los medios en campañas contra la extracción de minerales y petróleo en Perú y Ecuador, que a veces se basan en símbolos de la lucha de clases o la indigeneidad. Los ensayos también exploran las repercusiones internacionales de estas campañas y su influencia en el activismo solidario, incluyendo los intercambios incómodos y las frágiles alianzas que resultan. Los colaboradores examinan críticamente formas innovadoras de traducción y colaboración entre académicos, activistas, organizaciones indígenas y ambientales, artistas, periodistas y miembros de la comunidad, así como las tensiones que pueden resultar de estos esfuerzos colectivos. En conjunto, los ensayos contribuyen a una conversación interdisciplinaria en curso sobre tres temas: la representación, la materialidad y la traducción. RESUMO Os ensaios desses Diálogos exploram a expressão da cultura visual latino-americana no contexto da extração de recursos e conflitos relacionados à água, à terra e aos direitos da comunidade. Os contribuintes do fórum – cujas diversas origens disciplinares e profissionais conectam história da arte, antropologia, fotografia e ativismo – consideram como o trabalho criativo em diferentes mídias pode transmitir as contradições, ambiguidades e natureza fluída da relação das pessoas com as indústrias extrativas. Os ensaios exploram como essas formas de representação desafiam ideias populares e acadêmicas sobre conflitos sobre recursos. Alguns dos ensaios descrevem formas não convencionais de divulgação de pesquisas, como uma exposição sobre paisagens extrativistas com artistas visuais contemporâneos peruanos e um projeto de livro sobre mineração colombiana que combina fotografia documental e escrita etnográfica. Outros ensaios exploram o uso de imagens e tecnologias de mídia em campanhas contra extração de minerais e petróleo no Peru e no Equador, que às vezes dependem de símbolos da luta de classes ou da indigeneidade. Os ensaios também exploram as repercussões internacionais dessas campanhas e sua influência no ativismo solidário, incluindo as desconfortáveis trocas e alianças desconfortáveis que resultam. Os contribuintes examinam criticamente formas inovadoras de tradução e colaboração entre acadêmicos, ativistas, organizações indígenas e ambientais, artistas, jornalistas e membros da comunidade, bem como as tensões que podem resultar desses esforços coletivos. Juntos, o conjunto de ensaios contribui para a discussão interdisciplinar em curso sobre três temas: representação, materialidade e tradução.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLatin American and Latinx Visual CultureSame topicRhetoric and Communication StudiesFrench-language works237,207