MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995202286 · doi:10.32370/ia_2019_12_20

Forensic, Social and Criminal Law Regulation of ATF Operation: Applicable Provisions for Record-Keeping, Investigation and Registration

2019· article· en· W2995202286 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrii Kofanov, Nataliia Pavlovska, Eugenia Svoboda, Roman Kutsyi, Halyna Strilets

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Archive · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGun Ownership and Violence Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawImprisonmentBusinessIndictmentPolitical scienceWarrantLaw enforcementMagistrateEnforcement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For some time, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) [1,2] was a unit of the Department of the Treasury, authorized to conduct inspections, once during any 12-month period and without a warrant, for compliance with statutory requirements, or in the course of a criminal investigation of a person other than the licensee, or where the disposition of firearms must be determined (the Gun Control Act (GCA), 18 U.S.C. DOI 10.32370/IA_2019_12_20§ 923(g)(1)(B)).ATF is also authorized to inspect inventory and records by securing from a Federal magistrate judge a relevant warrant (18 U.S.C. § 923(g)(1)(A)).Customs officers may also inspect any firearms or related articles imported or exported from the U.S. Limitations on the rights of certain persons, associated with manufacturing, importing and dealing in firearms in the United States.Provisions of the Gun Control Act (GCA) stipulate that it is unlawful for certain categories of persons to ship, transport, receive or possess firearms (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)).It is also unlawful to sell or otherwise dispose of firearms to the persons (18 U.S.C. § 922(d)): who are under indictment for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year; who have been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year; who are fugitives from justice; who are unlawful users of or addicted to any controlled substance; who are illegally or unlawfully in the United States; who have been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions; who, having been a citizen of the United States, have renounced their citizenship; who are subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or have been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence (as stipulated by the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, Pub.L. 104-208, effective 30 September 1996) (18 U.S.C. § 922(g), § 922(n)).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0180.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0910.163

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntellectual ArchiveSame topicGun Ownership and Violence ResearchFrench-language works237,207