MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995215609 · doi:10.1159/000503228

Nomograms of Fetal Right Ventricular Fractional Area Change by 2D Echocardiography

2019· article· en· W2995215609 on OpenAlexaff
L. Guirado, F. Crispi, I. Soveral, Brenda Valenzuela‐Alcaráz, Mérida Rodríguez‐López, Laura García‐Otero, X. Torres, Á. Sepúlveda‐Martínez, Maria C. Escobar‐Diaz, Josep M. Martínez, Mark K. Friedberg, E. Gratacós, O. Gómez

Bibliographic record

VenueFetal Diagnosis and Therapy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNomogramIntraclass correlationFetal echocardiographyCardiologyGestationGestational ageInternal medicineFetusDiastoleReproducibilitySystolePrenatal diagnosisPregnancyBlood pressureMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Fetal right ventricular (RV) function assessment is challenging due to the RV geometry and limitations of in utero assessment. Postnatally, 2D echocardiographic RV fractional area change (FAC) is used to assess RV global systolic function by calculating the percentage of change in RV area from systole to diastole. Reports on FAC are scarce in prenatal life, and nomograms throughout pregnancy are not available. Our aims were (1) to study prenatal RV FAC feasibility and reproducibility and (2) to construct nomograms for RV FAC and end-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) RV areas from 18 to 41 weeks of gestation. METHODS: Prospective cohort study including 602 low-risk singleton pregnancies undergoing a fetal echocardiography from 18 to 41 weeks of gestation. RV ED and ES areas were measured following standard recommendations for ventricular dimensions and establishing strict landmarks to identify the different phases of the cardiac cycle. RV FAC was calculated as: ([ED area - ES area]/ED area) × 100. RV FAC intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was evaluated in 45 fetuses by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Parametric regressions were tested to model each parameter against gestational age (GA) and estimated fetal weight (EFW). RESULTS: RV areas and FAC were successfully obtained in ∼99% of fetuses with acceptable reproducibility throughout gestation (RV ED area inter-observer ICC [95% CI] 0.96 [0.93-0.98], RV ES area 0.97 [0.94-0.98], and FAC 0.69 [0.44-0.83]). Nomograms were constructed for RV ED and ES areas and FAC. RV areas showed a quadratic and logarithmic increase with GA and EFW, respectively. In contrast, RV FAC showed a slight quadratic decrease throughout gestation (mean RV FAC ranged from 36% at 18 weeks of gestation [10-90th centiles: 25-47%, respectively] to 29% at 41 weeks [10-90th centiles: 18-40%, respectively]). The best models for RV areas and FAC were a second-degree polynomial. CONCLUSIONS: RV FAC is a feasible and reproducible parameter to assess RV global systolic function in fetal life. We provide reference ranges adjusted by GA and EFW that can be used as normal references for the assessment of RV function in prenatal conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFetal Diagnosis and TherapySame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207