MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995292605 · doi:10.1364/ol.383757

Ultra-wideband dual-polarization silicon nitride power splitter based on modal engineered slot waveguides

2019· article· en· W2995292605 on OpenAlexaff
David González‐Andrade, Sylvain Guerber, Elena Durán-Valdeiglesias, Diego Pérez‐Galacho, Xavier Le Roux, Nathalie Vulliet, S. Crémer, S. Monfray, Éric Cassan, Delphine Marris‐Morini, F. Bœuf, Pavel Cheben, Laurent Vivien, Aitor V. Velasco, Carlos Alonso‐Ramos

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónH2020 European Research CouncilMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean CommissionComunidad de Madrid
KeywordsOpticsWidebandSplitterMaterials scienceModalPolarization (electrochemistry)Silicon nitrideOptoelectronicsSiliconPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon nitride (SiN) waveguides provide a substantially lower index contrast, thermo-optic coefficient, and reduced birefringence compared to silicon-on-insulator waveguides. These properties make SiN a prominent candidate for implementation of ultra-wideband dual-polarization photonics circuits with a great potential for datacom applications. State-of-the-art SiN power splitters are still hampered in terms of either bandwidth or single-polarization operation. Here, we propose to overcome these limitations by exploiting modal and waveguide symmetry engineering in a single-mode slot waveguide. This topology prevents mode-beating, while granting symmetric power splitting for both polarizations. Experimental characterization of the fabricated device shows low loss ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mn>0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="thinmathspace"/><mml:mspace width="thinmathspace"/><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> ) and imbalance ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="thinmathspace"/><mml:mspace width="thinmathspace"/><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> ) within an unprecedented bandwidth of 420 nm (1.26–1.68 µm).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207