MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995303744 · doi:10.4103/1673-5374.270315

Time course analysis of sensory axon regeneration in vivo by directly tracing regenerating axons

2019· article· en· W2995303744 on OpenAlexaff
Feng‐Quan Zhou, Ruiying Wang, Yiwen Hu, Run-Shan Duan, Shuguang Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueNeural Regeneration Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Eye InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsAxonDorsal root ganglionSciatic nerveElectroporationAxotomyAnatomyBiologyNeuroscienceSpinal cordRegeneration (biology)Cell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most current studies quantify axon regeneration by immunostaining regeneration-associated proteins, representing indirect measurement of axon lengths from both sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglia and motor neurons in the spinal cord. Our recently developed method of in vivo electroporation of plasmid DNA encoding for enhanced green fluorescent protein into adult sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglia provides a way to directly and specifically measure regenerating sensory axon lengths in whole-mount nerves. A mouse model of sciatic nerve compression was established by squeezing the sciatic nerve with tweezers. Plasmid DNA carrying enhanced green fluorescent protein was transfected by ipsilateral dorsal root ganglion electroporation 2 or 3 days before injury. Fluorescence distribution of dorsal root or sciatic nerve was observed by confocal microscopy. At 12 and 18 hours, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 days of injury, lengths of regenerated axons after sciatic nerve compression were measured using green fluorescence images. Apoptosis-related protein caspase-3 expression in dorsal root ganglia was determined by western blot assay. We found that in vivo electroporation did not affect caspase-3 expression in dorsal root ganglia. Dorsal root ganglia and sciatic nerves were successfully removed and subjected to a rapid tissue clearing technique. Neuronal soma in dorsal root ganglia expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein or fluorescent dye-labeled microRNAs were imaged after tissue clearing. The results facilitate direct time course analysis of peripheral nerve axon regeneration. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Guilin Medical University, China (approval No. GLMC201503010) on March 7, 2014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeural Regeneration ResearchSame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207