Brief Research Report: Sense of Belonging and Academic Help-Seeking as Self-Regulated Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Academic help-seeking is a self-regulatory strategy that can have an important influence on students’ learning and achievement. The primary goal of the present study was to investigate whether college students’ sense of belonging could be used to understand their academic help-seeking. In addition, two aspects of motivation, self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and utility value, were examined as predictors of adaptive and expedient help-seeking strategies within an integrative model. College students (N = 307) completed two online self-report surveys that assessed sense of belonging, motivation, and help-seeking. Results of structural equation modeling showed that sense of belonging significantly predicted reported use of adaptive help-seeking strategies, even when accounting for students’ motivation. Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning also positively predicted adaptive help-seeking strategies, whereas utility value negatively predicted expedient help-seeking strategies. Findings support the conclusion that college students’ perceptions of their social contexts inform if and how they seek help with their learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it