MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995585180 · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2951878

IEEE Access Special Section: Advances in Interference Mitigation Techniques for Device-to-Device Communications

2019· article· en· W2995585180 on OpenAlexaff
Masood Ur Rehman, Yue Gao, Mohammad Asad Rehman Chaudhry, Ghazanfar Ali Safdar, Yanli Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWirelessKey (lock)Computer networkWireless networkMobile broadbandTask (project management)Interference (communication)The InternetMachine to machineCellular networkTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)Internet of ThingsEmbedded systemComputer securityEngineeringWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of data-extensive applications such as online gaming and video sharing has resulted in an exponential increase in mobile data traffic. Advances in the Internet-of-Things (IoT) and 5G also require the fusion of multiple sensors and wireless devices operating in real time. Supporting such high data rate demands within the framework of existing wireless access networks is a challenging task. Addressing this ever-increasing demand of data-hungry devices in an efficient and effective manner has driven the wireless industry to look into new paradigms. Device-to-Device (D2D) and Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communications are viewed as promising solutions to this complex problem and hence a key enabling technology for 5G and IoT applications. The D2D is envisioned to operate either in out-band mode, representing use of a dedicated spectrum, or in-band mode, representing operation within the same spectrum of the existing cellular spectrum. Variations of Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and Human-to-Human (H2H) are used to deal with the specific nature and application of the wireless network under consideration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207