MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995706469 · doi:10.3917/spub.194.0485

Vieillissement et perte de mémoire : avis de migrants haïtiens résidant au Québec

2019· article· fr· W2995706469 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patrick Cloos, Stéphanie Collins, Wista Joubert, Ellen Rosenberg, Lara Gautier

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté Publique · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: ‘Dementia’ is usually presented as a syndrome characterized by the decline of one or more cognitive abilities such as memory loss. However, memory loss does not necessarily mean dementia. The most common type of dementia is Alzheimer’s disease. Its incidence increases with age. In medical anthropology, diseases represent socio-cultural constructs that are not recognized and interpreted in the same way by everyone. Moreover, the migratory context is a source of difficulties in the field of dementia. In this article, we discuss the links between old age, dementia and seeking help in this context. METHOD: This is an exploratory qualitative study. Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with women and men born in Haiti who then immigrated to Quebec. These interviews allowed us to discuss seniors’ status issues, the meaning of memory loss and seeking help. RESULTS: Interview data reveal a plurality of representations about memory loss and Alzheimer’s disease. They highlight a diversity of beliefs, attitudes and values that reflect cultural and social changes within the same community. Taking into account the context makes it possible to consider the transformation or continuity of representations and behaviors vis-à-vis loss of memory. CONCLUSION: Dementia does not seem to be a phenomenon that is easily approached in the Haitian community in Quebec. Our study reveals a lack of information in this regard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanté PubliqueSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207