Epidemiology, clinical treatment patterns, and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma in Manitoba
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a very poor survival rate, especially for those who do not receive a potentially curative therapy. Methods: Treatment details were collected for 320 HCC patients diagnosed in Manitoba between January 2011 and December 2015. Patients had a mean age of 67.3 years, and 71.6% were men. Of these patients, 67 (20.9%) received curative treatment, 36 (11.3%) received non-curative treatment, and 217 (67.8%) received supportive care only; 71.3% of patients had liver cirrhosis. Alcoholic cirrhosis was the most common etiology of chronic liver disease (22.2%). Results: Those who received curative treatment had a significantly lower incidence of portal vein thrombosis and multinodular disease than those in other groups. Patients who received supportive care only had a higher incidence of ascites. We found no difference in the distribution of cirrhosis or portal hypertension among the treatment groups. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates for the whole cohort were 27% and 14%, respectively. No significant change was found in 2-year survival for patients diagnosed in each year from 2011 to 2015 ( p = 0.250). Also, we found no significant change in proportion of treatment given to patients over the same period ( p = 0.432). Conclusion: The poor survival rate of HCC patients in Manitoba could potentially be improved by maximizing the use of local therapy and by implementing multidisciplinary–based case discussion. Efforts should also be directed toward early management of infective, alcoholic, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which will, we hope, lead to a reduction in the incidence of HCC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it