MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995734055 · doi:10.1111/cpf.12614

Relationship between plasma volume and essential blood constituents in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

2019· article· en· W2995734055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionInternal medicineCardiologyConfoundingEjection fractionHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Introduction Notwithstanding recent progress on molecular mechanisms underlying heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), multiple pathophysiological aspects of this condition including the basis of anaemia and other haematological disorders remain unresolved. In this study, we sought to determine the relationship of plasma volume (PV), a plausible confounding factor for the concentration of solutes in blood, with key haematological markers in HFpEF patients. Methods Total circulating PV was determined with high precision, automated carbon monoxide rebreathing in 24 stable HFpEF patients (70 ± 8 years, left ventricular ejection fraction = 55±5%) and 18 healthy age‐ and sex‐matched control (HC) individuals. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association of PV with a comprehensive set of haematological variables. Results Haematocrit (40·1 ± 4·9 versus 43·6 ± 2·7%, P = 0·004) and haemoglobin concentration (131 ± 16 versus 142 ± 7 g l −1 , P = 0·003) were reduced in HFpEF patients compared with HC individuals. In regression analyses, PV was negatively associated with haematocrit ( r = −0·45, P = 0·029) and haemoglobin concentration ( r = −0·44, P = 0·030) in HFpEF patients, whereas these variables were not associated with PV in HC individuals ( P ≥0·198). Regarding blood electrolytes, PV was negatively associated with K + ( r = −0·43, P = 0·036) and Ca 2+ ( r = −0·44, P = 0·032) in HFpEF patients but not in HC individuals ( P ≥0·734). None of the above associations were detected in HFpEF patients when using ideal instead of measured PV. Conclusion The blood concentration of routine markers of anaemia and electrolyte balance is specifically and linearly associated with PV in HFpEF patients. Excess or deficit of circulating PV may confound clinical diagnosis in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it